· 1/4/2011
Stinnett v. City of Chicago
Citations
- 630 F.3d 645
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17
- 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,070
- 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 167
- 2011 WL 9345
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a prior promotion list was “obsolete” six years after it was created
- focusing on the “relevant similarity” between the plaintiff and the comparator
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Tinder, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.