Skip to main content
· 1/4/2011

Stinnett v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 630 F.3d 645
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,070
  • 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 167
  • 2011 WL 9345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a prior promotion list was “obsolete” six years after it was created
  • focusing on the “relevant similarity” between the plaintiff and the comparator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Tinder, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.