Stinneford v. Spiegel Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding VAN ASDALE v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY 11073 that in-house counsel may bring suit under the Age Discrimi- nation in Employment Act
• “[T]he Supremacy clause demands that the federally mandated protections of the ADEA triumph over the state principle of at-will employment.”
• \[T]he Supremacy clause demands that the federally mandated protections of the ADEA triumph over the state principle of at-will employment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).