Stingle v. Nevel
Citations
- 9 Or. 62
Syllabus
<p>Statutes — Repeal by Implication — Amendment.</p> <p>Subdivision 2, of section 37, chapter 4, of miscellaneous laws, was repealed, by implication, by the act of October 20, 1876, entitled, “ An actprovide for the collection of school district taxes.”</p> <p>The act of 1878, entitled, “ An act to amend sections 8, n, 12, 25, 34, 37, 43 and 46 of chapter 4, of the miscellaneous laws of Oregon, pertaining to common schools,” did not repeal the act of 1876. The only amendment made by that act to said section 37, was to add subdivision 9 of the amended section.</p> <p>Where a constitutional provision requires an amendment to be made by publishing the act or section, amended at full length, those portions of the old law copied into the enactment without change, are not reenacted.</p>
Judges: Waldo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-28· cited 31×
- State v. CochranOregon Supreme Court· 1909-10-12· cited 27×
- Hecker v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court· 1901-10-14· cited 22×
- Oregon & Washington Mortgage Savings Bank v. JordanOregon Supreme Court· 1888-02-29· cited 20×
- Allison v. HattonOregon Supreme Court· 1905-03-27· cited 20×
- Lampkin v. PikeSupreme Court of Georgia· 1902-07-17· cited 12×
- State v. ChadwickOregon Supreme Court· 1882-10-15· cited 11×
- City of Woodburn v. AplinOregon Supreme Court· 1913-04-15· cited 7×
- Miller v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-12-19· cited 5×
- Dalton v. East PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1884-10-15· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1815-11-15· cited 128×
- Burwell v. TullisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1867-07-15· cited 24×
- Pond v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1869-07-01· cited 21×
- Clarke v. GanzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1875-03-30· cited 12×
- Alexander v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1857-06-08· cited 10×
- Deming v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court· 1874-01-15· cited 2×
- Price v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court· 1874-11-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.