Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/23/1994
Stine v. Stine
Citations
- 880 P.2d 142
- 179 Ariz. 385
- 172 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23
- 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[t]he meaning of a decree is to be determined 2We cite the current version of § 25-318 because no revisions to subsection (P
- “A meaning should not be assigned to part of the language which would render another part meaningless.”
- “A meaning should not be assigned to part of the language which would render another part meaningless, nor remake the language to alter the existing rights or obligations.”
- “A meaning should not be assigned to part of the language [in a decree] which would render another part meaningless, nor remake the language to alter the existing rights or obligations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Kleinschmidt, Fidel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.