Stine v. Churnick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial judge must be present for voir dire proceedings in all future criminal cases even though defendant in that case had waived that right
• concluding that trial judge must be present for voir dire proceedings in all future criminal cases even though defendant in that case had waived that right
• holding that criminal defendant can waive right to have judge present during voir dire as required by Practice Book § 848, now § 42-12
• holding that criminal defendant implicitly waived right to have trial judge present during voir dire by acquiescing when judge left courtroom and by asking judge to return only when judicial determinations needed
• holding that criminal defendant implicitly waived right to have trial judge present during voir dire by acquiescing when judge left courtroom and by asking judge to return only when judicial determinations needed
• prescribing rule, consistent with rules of practice, requiring trial judge to be present during voir dire in criminal cases but imposing further limitation not addressed in rule that neither party can waive this requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).