Stinchfield v. Gerry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where employee handbook specified that “no officer other than [employee’s President could execute any binding agreement with employees,” lack of President’s signature on purported arbitration agreement prevented it from being enforceable
• holding that an arbitration agreement was subject to the general provisions of an employee handbook, which indicated that the handbook’s contents were merely guidelines and were unilaterally modifiable by the employer at any time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).