· 12/21/1992
Stimson v. Carlson
Citations
- 11 Cal. App. 4th 1201
- 14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 670
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10247
- 1993 A.M.C. 1049
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 17161
- 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Court will not strain to create an ambiguity 12 where none exists or indulge in tortured constructions to divine some theoretical ambiguity 13 in order to find coverage where none was contemplated.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reardon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.