Skip to main content

Stimpson v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 988 So. 2d 1119
  • 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904
  • 2008 WL 2774434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, based on evidence presented at summary judgment, that “[t]he Stimpsons should have been given the opportunity to prove concealment by Ford and to demonstrate that their claims were not barred by the statute of repose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evander, Orfinger, Pleus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.