Skip to main content
· 4/23/1900

Stimpson Computing Scale Co. v. George Schetrompf & Sons

Citations

  • 13 Pa. Super. 377
  • 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 163

Syllabus

<p>•Contract — Bailment—Delivery—Damages—Action.</p> <p>Where a contract to which is superadded an executory agreement of ■sale.ds between the parties unquestionably a bailment, the bailor cannot ■recover the value of the article in question when the affidavit of defense •sets-up that the defendant countermanded the alleged order, because of fraudulent representations before shipment, and never received the article contracted for. The most that could be recovered wquld be damages suffered’bv reason of breach of a covenant which provided that the order should not be countermanded, and even such recovery is doubtful under the statement filed which set up a sale as the cause of action.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Swope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.