Stimpert v. Abdnour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the work product “rule does not protect material and relevant evidentiary facts from the truth-seeking processes of discovery”
• copy of statement obtained by the plaintiff from minor defendant prior to filing suit is subject to court production order even though “the ingenuity of counsel may have been responsible for finding the defendant, obtaining a stenographer, and posing questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).