Skip to main content
· 11/15/1990

Stiltjes v. RIDCO EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.

Citations

  • 399 S.E.2d 708
  • 197 Ga. App. 852
  • 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff in her individual capacity and in her capacity as administratrix are legally different persons
  • holding that collateral estoppel did not bar the litigation of an issue because the plaintiff, currently acting in her fiduciary capacity, was a legally different person than she was in the prior case in which she acted in her individual capacity
  • holding that collateral estoppel did not bar the litigation of an issue because the plaintiff, currently acting in her fiduciary capacity, was a legally different person than she was in the prior case in which she acted in her individual capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMurray, Carley, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.