Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• §§ 50-51 “do not prohibit the incidental, momentary and isolated use” of a person’s name in a fictional movie
• §§ 50 and 51 “do not prohibit the incidental, momentary and isolated use” of a person’s name in a fictional movie

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Netzer v. Continuity Graphic Associates, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-04-07· cited 62×
• Beverley v. Choices Women's Medical Center, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1991-12-23· cited 31×
• Radio Today, Inc. v. Westwood One, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1988-04-19· cited 26×
• Delan v. CBS, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-01-24· cited 25×
• El Meson Espanol v. Nym Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1975-07-11· cited 17×
• Ladany v. William Morrow & Co., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1978-12-27· cited 17×
• El Meson Espanol v. NYM CORPORATION
  S.D. New York· 1974-12-27· cited 6×
• D'ANDREA v. Rafla-Demetrious
  E.D. New York· 1997-08-05· cited 4×
• Doe v. Darien Lake Theme Park & Camping Resort, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-11-13

Other cases named Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-06-26· cited 10×
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  New York Supreme Court· 1956-01-04· cited 7×
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1957-12-06
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-10-09
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-11-27