Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• §§ 50-51 “do not prohibit the incidental, momentary and isolated use” of a person’s name in a fictional movie
• §§ 50 and 51 “do not prohibit the incidental, momentary and isolated use” of a person’s name in a fictional movie

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-06-26· cited 10×
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  New York Supreme Court· 1956-01-04· cited 7×
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1957-12-06
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-10-09
• Stillman v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-11-27