Skip to main content
· 4/1/1941

Stiles v. Bodkin

Citations

  • 43 Cal. App. 2d 839
  • 111 P.2d 675
  • 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no merger despite acceptance of deed to property on which improvements, called for by the contract of sale, had not yet been made
  • statute of limitations and laches do not apply to fraud claim asserted only defensively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.