Stiglich v. Tracks, D.C., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no coverage for negligence claim because proof of excluded act necessary to make the claim
• nearly identical assault and battery exclusion; damages for failure to hire adequate security excluded
• policy’s assault and battery exclusion precluded coverage of claim where dance club was sued for negligent failure to prevent or stop assault by a patron of the club

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).