Skip to main content
· 7/14/1973

Stickney v. Murdock Steel & Engineering, Inc.

Citations

  • 512 P.2d 339
  • 212 Kan. 653
  • 1973 Kan. LEXIS 565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • owner’s demand for substitution or replacement of material, insisting that the contract was not complete, served to extend the contract
  • court finds lien valid as it dates from the time the subcontractor “received word from the building owner that he then considered the subcontractor’s work under the original contract to have been satisfactorily concluded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.