Stichter v. Zuidema

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the circuit court improperly considered extrinsic evidence in determining whether an unambiguous contract made the plaintiffs third-party beneficiaries
• finding the circuit court improperly considered extrinsic evidence in determining whether an unambiguous contract made the plaintiffs third-party beneficiaries
• “If a contract is not ambiguous, the express provisions govern and there is no need for further inquiry into the intention of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).