Stice v. State Board of Bar Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing portion of remand order that resubstituted an individual defendant for the United States, and thus destroyed diversity jurisdiction, because it necessarily preceded the remand and would not be reviewed by the state court
• “[T]he district court subjected [the substituted party] to the burden of defending a suit in state court, a burden from which she is entitled to be immune.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).