Stewart-Veal v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s negligence claim “based on the actions of the arresting officers” was properly dismissed because it was “not separate and distinct from [her] false arrest claim”
• upholding trial court's dismissal of negligence count because \it [wa]s not separate and distinct from the false arrest claim\
• affirming dismissal of a negligence claim “based on the alleged negligence of the arresting officers in conducting the arrest”
• affirming dismissal of the plaintiff’s negligence claim because it was “not separate and distinct from [the plaintiff’s] false arrest claim; rather, it is intertwined with and dependent on that claim”
• affirming dismissal of the plaintiff’s negligence claim because it was “not separate and distinct from [the plaintiff’s] false arrest claim; rather, it is intertwined with and dependent on that claim”
• affirming dismissal of the plaintiff’s negligence claim because it was “not separate and distinct from [the plaintiff’s] false arrest claim; rather, it [was] intertwined with and dependent on that claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).