Stewart v. Wheeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “verdict of a jury . . . cannot be regarded as a conviction” for the purposes of voter disenfranchisement, and that “[t]here must have been a final 56 judgment pronounced”
• \Judicial and legislative acts of a state ... impairing the rights of citizens under the Constitution of the United States are invalid and void.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).