Skip to main content
· 6/30/1995

Stewart v. Weis Markets, Inc.

Citations

  • 890 F. Supp. 382
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9298
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 259
  • 1995 WL 394373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[n]either Title VII nor the PHRA is designed to protect the overly sensitive plaintiff.”
  • harassment of plaintiff was sufficiently frequent and done with such disregard for who was in a position to overhear or observe it that store manager knew or must have known that it was occurring
  • harassment of plaintiff was sufficiently frequent and done with such disregard for who was in a position to overhear or observe it that store manager knew or must have known that it was occurring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCLURE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.