Skip to main content
· 3/27/1995

Stewart v. Walbridge, Aldinger Co.

Citations

  • 882 F. Supp. 1441
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4827
  • 1995 WL 217333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court need not rely on the bare allegations but “may consider the range of proof necessary to support class certification”
  • noting that the court need not rely on the bare allegations but “may consider the range of proof necessary to support class certification”
  • certifying class of African-American and Latino men who were allegedly stopped and frisked by police street crimes unit without reasonable suspicion
  • certifying a class action of persons subjected to racial profiling by the Highland Park Police Department
  • rejecting lack of mental competence as reason by itself for appointing a plaintiff as class representative
  • certi- fying a class of persons stopped and frisked within the city of New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Latchum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.