Stewart v. State
Citations
- 42 Tex. 242
Syllabus
<p>1. Intebvenor—appeal. A judgment dismissing a petition of intervention is not such a final judgment as will authorize an appeal by the intervenor, before final judgment rendered in the court below on the matters in issue between plaintiff and defendant. Were the practice different, the remedy of intervention would cause a multiplicity of suits, instead of preventing them, which is its main object.</p> <p>2. Bank account. A bank account hook, being a chose in action not assignable by delivery, its delivering to a third party will not vest in him dominion over the money it represents, nor authorize him to maintain an action for it in his own name.</p>
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court· 1881-10-07· cited 100×
- Kimmel v. LyttonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1963-10-24· cited 18×
- Mueller v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-07-19· cited 9×
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1975-09-03· cited 6×
- Polk County v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1955-11-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.