Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 44 S.W.3d 582
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 29
  • 2001 WL 387942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • did not disavow venue-proof-failure acquittal by Court of Appeals, but reversed on misapplication of which venue statute applied
  • “[T]he gravamen of theft is in depriving the true owner of the use, benefit, enjoyment or value of his property, without his consent.”
  • “[T]he gravamen of theft is in depriving the true owner of the use, benefit, enjoyment or value of his property , without his consent.”
  • the “crucial element of theft is the deprivation of property from the rightful owner, without the owner’s consent”
  • the “crucial element of theft is the deprivation of property from the rightful owner, without the owner‟s consent”
  • “Anyone who is in a position to take some action that deprives the owner of property is in a position to exercise control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Holcomb, Holland, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.