Stewart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that van was not stopped by officers because it was already stationary when they approached
• finding that officer’s approaching vehicle “interfered with no one’s freedom of movement and caused minimal inconvenience and loss of time”
• holding a consensual encounter initially occurred when officers approached a parked van and shined their spotlights into the van, but it became a reasonable and valid investigatory detention when the driver exited the vehicle and the officers smelled marijuana
• holding a consensual encounter initially occurred when officers approached a parked van and shined their spotlights into the van, but it became a reasonable and valid investigatory detention when the driver exited the vehicle and the officers smelled marijuana
• holding a consensual encounter initially occurred when officers approached a parked van and shined their spotlights into the van, but it became a reasonable and valid investigatory detention when the driver exited the vehicle and the officers smelled marijuana
• stating initial contact was an encounter when driver got out of the van without being requested to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Garcia-Cantu
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07· cited 791×
• Crain v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-30· cited 681×
• Garza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-05-17· cited 220×
• Johnson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-09-30· cited 73×
• Martin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-04-24· cited 47×
• Juhasz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-06-24· cited 46×
• Davis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-07-20· cited 45×
• State v. Baker
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 35×
• State v. Priddy
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-20· cited 34×
• Reynolds v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-02-19· cited 31×
• State v. Woodard
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-04-01· cited 28×
• Lopez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-11· cited 11×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-30· cited 7×
• State v. Garcia-Cantu
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-05-23· cited 4×
• Solomon Hailu Solomon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-06-10
• State v. Katherine Marie Carter
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-10-20
• in the Interest of R.H.
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-11-16
• Katherine Wiseman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-11-16
• in the Matter of G. L. v.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-01-17
• Ex Parte: Adelaida Contreras
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-11-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Delaware v. Prouse
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
• United States v. Ramsey
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-06· cited 663×
• Armstrong v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-03· cited 137×
• Ablon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-06-09· cited 101×