Stewart v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[t]he suggestion that an arbitration clause is unconscionable because discovery either is unavailable or more limited in arbitration than in litigation is preposterous\
• labeling the Bradford opinion “meticulously reasoned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).