Stewart v. McMickens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “legitimacy of the case must be apparent from the face of the pleading”
• holding that the “legitimacy of the case must be apparent from the face of the pleading”
• holding that the “legitimacy of the case must be apparent from the face of the pleading”
• inquiry is if pro se plaintiff’s claims may have merit “from the face of the pleading”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Posner v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
  E.D. New York· 1989-05-19· cited 30×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estelle v. Gamble
  Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
• Daniels v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 7,676×
• Allen Hodge v. Police Officers: Colon, 623 and Repuerto, 145
  Second Circuit· 1986-09-29· cited 1,513×
• Slayton v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1971-11-16· cited 115×
• Robert P. Koch v. David L. Yunich, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  Second Circuit· 1976-04-02· cited 99×
• Doherty v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1971-11-09· cited 22×
• Auen v. Sweeney
  N.D. New York· 1986-03-31· cited 6×