Stewart v. Keisler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]pisodes of name-calling, inappropriate behavior by a supervisor, and other perceived slights . . . do not constitute a hostile work environment even if taken as true.”
• “[E]pisodes of name-calling, inappropriate behavior by a supervisor, and other perceived slights, which, however regrettable, do not constitute a hostile work environment even if taken as true.”
• “episodes of name-calling, inappropriate behavior by a supervisor, and other perceived slights, which, however regrettable, do not constitute a hostile work environment even if taken as true”
• supervisor’s derogatory comments about “ ‘niggers’ ” made five times over a period of six weeks were insufficient as a matter of law to establish hostile environment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).