Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding meritless plaintiff’s claim that timing of discharge related to her request for accommodations because “[i]t is undisputed that the numerous acts of alleged insubordination in this case occurred around the same time period as [the plaintiff’s] request for accommodations”
• a plaintiff has the burden of proving that the accommodation identified by plaintiff is reasonable
• “[A]n employee is entitled only to a reasonable accommodation and not to a preferred accommodation.”
• An “individual with a disability is not entitled to the accommodation of her choice, but only to a reasonable accommodation.” (cleaned up)
• “[W]e assess ADA retaliation claims under the same framework we employ for retal- iation claims arising under Title VII.”
• “[A]n employer is not required to accommodate an employee in any manner in which that employee desires.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).