Stewart v. Gold & Copper Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retroactive application of section 508.046 does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause because it is discretionary rule addressing a prisoner’s ‘suitability, not eligibility, for parole’” ( quoting Wallace , 516 F.3d at 355 – 56)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).