Stewart v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusal of the court to permit the witness to answer improper questions cannot remove the prejudicial effect that the questions had on the minds of the jury
• refusal of the court to permit the witness to answer improper questions cannot remove the prejudicial effect that the questions had on the minds of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thorgerson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 702×
• Slaven v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 94×
• Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rowland's Administrator
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1929-02-12· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1963-03-15· cited 19×
• Davidson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1935-10-04· cited 9×
• McHargue v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-03-17· cited 8×
• Steele v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1923-06-15· cited 5×
• Rollyson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1959-02-06· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Clary v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-02-19· cited 42×
• L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Payne
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1909-07-01· cited 31×
• Shields' Admrs. v. Rowland
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-12-10· cited 27×
• Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Reaume
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1908-02-06· cited 17×
• Consolidation Coal Co. v. Vanover
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-10-13· cited 13×
• United States v. Hirsch
  E.D. New York· 1918-11-11· cited 10×