· 12/7/2011
Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Premier Title, Inc.
Citations
- 84 Va. Cir. 39
- 2011 WL 10563537
- 2011 Va. Cir. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between documents that indicate “the general purpose of the work performed,” and are not privileged, and those that “reveal . . . the specific nature of the services provided,” which are
- “pre-engagement documents” were not privileged where there was no evidence of an intention to retain the attorney “in a legal capacity at the time the communications were made”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.