Skip to main content
· 12/7/2011

Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Premier Title, Inc.

Citations

  • 84 Va. Cir. 39
  • 2011 WL 10563537
  • 2011 Va. Cir. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between documents that indicate “the general purpose of the work performed,” and are not privileged, and those that “reveal . . . the specific nature of the services provided,” which are
  • “pre-engagement documents” were not privileged where there was no evidence of an intention to retain the attorney “in a legal capacity at the time the communications were made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.