STEWART, MICHELLE v. KIER, SUZANNE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a provision of a CBA guaranteeing health benefits for \employees\ did not apply to former employees who retired before the date that the CBA went into effect
• holding that a provision of a CBA guaranteeing health benefits for \employees\ did not apply to former employees who retired before the date that the CBA went into effect
• holding that a provision of a CBA guaranteeing health benefits for \employees\ did not apply to former employees who retired before the date that the CBA went into effect
• holding that a provision of a CBA guaranteeing health benefits for \employees\ did not apply to former employees who retired before the date that the CBA went into effect
• holding that a provision of a CBA guaranteeing health benefits for \employees\ did not apply to former employees who retired before the date that the CBA went into effect
• “Because mootness is jurisdictional, we can and must consider it even if neither party has raised it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).