Stewart Ginsberg v. Healey Car & Truck Leasing, Inc. And Michael P. Healey, John Fitzgerald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Healey's provision of background information to a police officer does not by itself make Healey a joint participant in state action under Section 1983.”
• private actor’s “provision of background information to a police officer does not by itself make [him] a joint participant in state action under Section 1983”
• “[An appellee’s] provision of background information to a police officer does not by itself make [that appellee] a joint participant in state action under Section 1983.”
• private party’s “provision of background information to a police officer does not by itself make [the private party] a joint participant in state action under Section 1983”
• “Where . . . a police officer exercises independent judgment . . ., the private party is not ‘jointly engaged’ in the officer’s conduct so as to render it a state actor under Section 1983.”
• evidence of a “concerted effort or plan” could support state action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).