Stevenson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s claim of mental retardation where his IQ was 68 because “[a] low IQ score by itself, however, does not support a finding of mental retardation”
• “A low IQ score by itself, however, does not support a finding of mental retardation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kenneth Wayne Morris v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-06-16· cited 90×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-13· cited 60×
• Morris v. Dretke
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-06-30
• Howard, Jamaal
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-13
• Stevenson, Exzavier Lamont
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-03-21
• Stevenson, Ex Parte Exzavier Lamont
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-03-21
• in the Matter of V.G., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2022-07-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Penry v. Lynaugh
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
• Ex Parte Tennard
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-18· cited 33×
• Dixon v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 32×