Skip to main content

Stevenson v. State

Citations

  • 733 So. 2d 177
  • 1998 WL 909536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that malice aforethought is not required under Section 97-3-19(2)(a)
  • holding that malice aforethought is not required under Section 97-3-19(2)(a)
  • holding that malice aforethought is not required under Section 97-3-19(2)(a)
  • noting deliberate design is not required and the state’s special interest in protecting law enforcement officers
  • noting deliberate design is not required and the state’s special interest in protecting law enforcement officers
  • noting deliberate design is not required and the state’s special interest in protecting law enforcement officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prather, C.J., and McRae and Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.