Skip to main content
· 3/16/1965

Stevenson v. Silverman

Citations

  • 417 Pa. 187
  • 208 A.2d 786
  • 1965 Pa. LEXIS 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[t]he doctrine of res judicata is based on public policy and seeks to prevent an individual from being vexed twice for the same cause.\
  • “[t]he doctrine of res judicata is based on public policy and seeks to prevent an individual from being vexed twice for the same cause.”
  • “A final valid judgment upon the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any future suit between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action.”
  • \A final valid judgment upon the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction bars any future suit between the same parties or their privies on the same cause of action.\
  • “The doctrine of res judicata is based on public policy and seeks to prevent an individual from being vexed twice for the same cause.”
  • “The doctrine of res judicata applies to and is binding, not only on actual parties to the litigation, but also to those who are in privity with them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Mtjsmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.