Stevens v. U.S. Sprint Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument that the expert’s findings were unreliable because they had not been tested or peer reviewed
• rejecting an inconsistency argument as criticism of results, not methodology

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).