California Court of Appeal· 5/15/1961
Stevens v. Torregano
Citations
- 192 Cal. App. 2d 105
- 13 Cal. Rptr. 604
- 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 1914
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- though an executor had no duty to search out unknown heirs, to withhold information of a known heir constituted fraud because an executor is a fiduciary
- if executor knows of heir and withholds that information from the court, his doing so is extrinsic fraud, justifying a suit in equity by that heir to impose a constructive trust
- if executor knows of heir and withholds that information from the court, his doing so is extrinsic fraud, justifying a suit in equity by that heir to impose a constructive trust
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duniway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Estate of SandersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-12-23· cited 49×
- Doolittle v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-10-20· cited 30×
- Parage v. CouedelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-12-22· cited 29×
- Smith by Young v. Estate of KingMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-04-24· cited 28×
- In Re Estate of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-10-03· cited 22×
- Bodine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-11-08· cited 18×
- Goldberg v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-06-27· cited 16×
- Estate of PoderCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-07-14· cited 13×
- Marsh v. EdelsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-06-25· cited 12×
- Estate of MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-12-20· cited 10×
- Bank of Am. v. HodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-09-28· cited 8×
- Estate of PageCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-09-28· cited 7×
- Munn v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-06-10· cited 7×
- First Central Coast Bank v. Cuesta Title Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal· 1983-05-17· cited 6×
- Estate of OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-02-13· cited 6×
- Estate of BrisselCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-08-02· cited 5×
- In Re Milliman's EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-10-20· cited 4×
- Pitzer v. Union Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-31· cited 3×
- Salvation Army v. RohdeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-02-13· cited 1×
- Lingle v. National FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-08-02· cited 1×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-05-28· cited 134×
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-27· cited 126×
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-11-01· cited 103×
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-12-17· cited 95×
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-09-17· cited 89×
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-05-27· cited 87×
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-11-01· cited 85×
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-03-26· cited 72×
- Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-05-24· cited 68×
- Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-03-20· cited 68×
- Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-08-02· cited 66×
- In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-05-09· cited 63×
- In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-02-20· cited 55×
- State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 53×
- Larrabee v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-02-25· cited 49×
- Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-10-17· cited 47×
- Carr v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1938-06-01· cited 44×
- Purinton v. DysonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-02-24· cited 44×
- Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-04-18· cited 43×
- Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-01-27· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.