Stevens v. Stevens County Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failing to apply the “shift- to-I” rule was plain error and exercising discretion to cor- rect the error on the basis that the defendant received a sen- tence longer than the maximum permitted by law
• explaining \shift-to-I\ rule and that it was plain error to not apply the rule in that case
• treating error in failing to apply OAR 213-012-0020(2)(a)(B) as plain error and exercising discretion to correct it
• exercising our discretion to correct the error, and remanding for resentenc-ing because it was not certain that the trial court could, or would, impose the same sentence on remand
• “We have previously considered error in failing to apply the ‘shift to column I’ rule to be plain error ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).