Stevens v. Stevens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although the trial court judgment effectively quieted title “based upon a theory which we deem[ed] inappropriate,” we affirmed it because, we explained, “if it can be sustained upon any ground it will be upheld.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hough v. Washington State Personnel Board
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-13· cited 12×
• State v. Douty
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-03· cited 5×
• Grasser v. Blakkolb
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-01-10· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tenco, Inc. v. Manning
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-01-25· cited 34×
• United Benefit Life Insurance v. Price
  Washington Supreme Court· 1955-05-05· cited 30×
• Bergstrom v. Olson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1951-11-05· cited 16×
• Hill v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-12-14· cited 14×
• Brenner v. J. J. Brenner Oyster Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-06-05· cited 7×
• Cogshall v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 1919-05-15· cited 2×
• Brenner v. J. J. Brenner Oyster Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1957-08-13· cited 1×