Skip to main content

Stevens v. State

Citations

  • 422 N.E.2d 1297
  • 1981 Ind. App. LEXIS 1536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing record to determine if modification would prejudice defendant; “Where it is evident that defendant has not been mislead and the issues joined under the charging information have been determined, modification, rather than reversal is more appropriate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Miller, Chipman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.