· 5/29/1998
Stevens v. Redwing
Citations
- 146 F.3d 538
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10711
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[a] pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case”
- stating that “[a] pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case”
- stating that “[a] pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case”
- stating that “[a] pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case”
- stating that “[a] pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case”
- stating that “[a] pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.