Stevens v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that recovery of damages for breach requires proof of actual loss and resultant damages
• awarding nominal damages plus costs when the plaintiffs failed to establish compensatory damages arising from an admitted breach of contract, because “[a]ppeUees [were] confronted with annoyances and possible loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American Insurance
  D. New Mexico· 1994-11-07· cited 85×
• Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. Wolfe
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-02-10· cited 66×
• Chandler v. Battenfield
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1951-07-13· cited 30×
• Christman v. Voyer
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-05-01· cited 28×
• Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1959-02-16· cited 23×
• Ruiz v. Varan
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 21×
• Jemez Properties, Inc. v. Lucero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-12-27· cited 18×
• Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. v. Redwood Fire & Casualty Insurance
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-11-02· cited 16×
• Adams v. Cox
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-07-29· cited 12×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-07-10· cited 50×
• Chaffin v. . Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1904-04-19· cited 40×
• Batson v. Higginbothem
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1910-06-14· cited 20×