Skip to main content
· 5/18/1982

Stevens v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 415 So. 2d 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to \maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists\
  • asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to “maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists”
  • asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to “maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists”
  • no liability imposed where foliage entirely on property obstructed view of the intersection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, Nesbitt and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.