· 5/18/1982
Stevens v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 415 So. 2d 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to \maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists\
- asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to “maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists”
- asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to “maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists”
- no liability imposed where foliage entirely on property obstructed view of the intersection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, Nesbitt and Jorgenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.