Stevens v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to \maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists\
• asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to “maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists”
• asserting that in the absence of a violation of a statute, a landowner does not have a duty to “maintain his property in a condition so that a motorist approaching a public highway intersection can see other approaching motorists”
• no liability imposed where foliage entirely on property obstructed view of the intersection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 99×
• Town of Belleair v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-02· cited 12×
• Dawson v. Ridgley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-26· cited 5×
• Piedra v. City of North Bay Village
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-04· cited 2×
• Whitt v. Silverman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DeJesus v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-06-06· cited 108×
• Evans v. Southern Holding Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-25· cited 28×
• Pedigo v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-25· cited 14×
• Tucker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-12· cited 1×