Skip to main content
· 8/10/1992

Stevens v. Hilmy

Citations

  • 185 A.D.2d 840
  • 587 N.Y.S.2d 375
  • 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff cannot proceed in the absence of standing, so derivative action properly subject to sua sponte dismissal despite lack of any assertion by defendants objecting to plaintiff's standing
  • plaintiff cannot proceed in the absence of standing, so derivative action properly subject to sua sponte dismissal despite lack of any assertion by defendants objecting to plaintiff's standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.