Ohio Supreme Court· 7/21/2022
Stevens v. Hill
Citations
- 168 Ohio St. 3d 427
- 199 N.E.3d 529
- 2022 Ohio 2479
Syllabus
Habeas corpus—Court of appeals correctly denied writ because petitioner's prison sentence had not expired, sentencing court did not patently and unambiguously lack subject-matter jurisdiction, and petitioner otherwise had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by which to pursue his claims—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State ex rel. Norman v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court· 2023-03-29· cited 2×
- Christian v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 2023-05-04· cited 2×
- Chester v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-15· cited 1×
- Bridges v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-05
- Folley v. Chambers-SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-24
- Mason v. ForsheyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-25
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 274×
- Leyman v. Bradshaw (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-22· cited 47×
- Smith v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-10· cited 44×
- State v. JulianoOhio Supreme Court· 1970-12-09· cited 35×
- State ex rel. Davis v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-05-26· cited 33×
- Jackson v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 31×
- Bozsik v. HudsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-09-06· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Norris v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-10-10· cited 26×
- Stever v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-15· cited 19×
- Orr v. Schweitzer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-05-27· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.