Stevens v. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, under federal perjury statute, “when a line of questioning ‘is so vague as to be fundamentally ambiguous, the answers associated with the questions posed may be insufficient as a matter of law to support the perjury conviction’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).