Stevens v. Department of Social Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the Board’s statutory authorization to determine whether [benefit] decisions are in conflict with state of federal law is [not] limited in any respect, much less that it excludes consideration of equitable estoppel as a defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).