Stevens v. Chandler Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The principle of the cases seems to be that a court may not rule that an error in ... the giving of an erroneous charge can be cured by the verdict when the court is required to speculate as to what facts the jury relied on in reaching the verdict it did.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yost v. Miner
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1968-12-10· cited 21×
• Spence v. Wiles
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-10-08· cited 21×
• Zenith Transport, Ltd. v. Bellingham National Bank
  Washington Supreme Court· 1964-09-24· cited 10×
• Haney v. Gregory
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-11-30· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sonnenburg v. Monumental Motor Tours, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1951-06-15· cited 39×
• Williams v. Dawidowicz
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-01· cited 38×
• Cocco v. Lissau
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-05-04· cited 37×
• Lehmann v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-12-18· cited 36×
• Sieland v. Gallo
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-01· cited 31×
• Warnke v. Essex
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-05-27· cited 25×
• Wright v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-10-01· cited 18×
• Havens v. Schaffer
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-06-17· cited 10×
• Van Houtum v. Associated Broadcasting Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1950-01-09· cited 3×
• Lawrence v. Merrick
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1952-10-17· cited 2×