Stevens v. Burgess

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the repeal and reenactment of a statute renders moot any decision on whether the original bill was properly enacted
• finding that a constitutional interpretation producing an absurd result is unreasonable
• affirming the trial court judgment finding the plaintiffs’ claim was moot because the plaintiffs had alleged a procedural defect in the enactment of a statute that had since been repealed and reenacted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).